Players should get paid. That's not the debate. That was never the debate.
The debate is why the same AD offices that used NIL as a recruiting pitch in 2021 are now quietly back-channeling the NCAA to cap rosters and tighten transfer windows. They sold NIL as a revolution. What they meant was: a revolution that works in our favor. Two years of building a program, two years of developing a quarterback or an edge rusher, and then March comes and the portal opens and the market does exactly what a market does. Suddenly the people who called it player empowerment are calling it roster instability. Funny how that works. The money was fine when it was pulling five-star prospects to your campus. The freedom was fine when it kept a kid from transferring away from a bad situation. The second that same freedom moves a player off your roster and onto someone else's, now we need rules. Now we need structure. Now we need a committee.
You built this market. You lobbied for it, you funded the collectives, you used it in living rooms to close recruits. The inconvenience you're experiencing right now is just the market working. Screenshot this.