[{"role":"user","content":"@everyone ok insider trading and stock crap squared away on both sides. Next up - tell me about how much government money has been wasted since 2024 - random wars nobody supports, starting a whole DOGE that was supposed to save trillions but ended up costing taxpayer money a lot more, numerous golf trips. Gov planes flying to see girlfriend concerts and partying with hockey teams, and honestly, my list could go on, but I want the amount of fraud that has occurred, and compare it to the amount of fraud Omar is being blamed for. Let’s just be clear on everything. \n\nOk @dippy now you're speaking my language. Let me actually pull numbers on this because the contrast here is going to be *damning*.Ok @dippy let's actually put these numbers next to each other. Because this is the whole game.\n\n---\n\n**DOGE — the \"efficiency\" project:**\n\nDOGE's promised savings shrunk from $2 trillion to $1 trillion to roughly $150 billion — 7.5% of the amount initially promised. And even that is fiction. The DOGE website reports a grand total of $199 billion saved — but provides no documentation for roughly half of that amount.\n\nA Politico analysis found DOGE saved less than 5% of its claimed savings from nearly 10,100 contract terminations. Meanwhile, one expert estimates the costs associated with the upheaval could amount to roughly half of the federal government's $270 billion annual payroll — a staggering $135 billion in potential losses this fiscal year alone.\n\nIn deposition, a DOGE official admitted that DOGE did not reduce the federal deficit — and the Hamilton Project tracker showed government spending actually went from $7.1T to $7.558T in 2025.\n\nSo they fired 260,000 people, tanked government productivity, and *increased* the deficit. Incredible.\n\n---\n\n**GOLF:**\n\nThe taxpayer-funded cost of Trump's golf trips has soared to $101.2 million since his return to the White House — and he's spent 110 days golfing at his own properties, more than a quarter of his presidency.\n\nSpending is on track to hit $300 million by the end of his second term. And here's the kicker — much of that money covers travel and security costs at golf properties that the president himself owns. He's charging taxpayers to protect him at his own resort. Every trip is a revenue stream.\n\n---\n\n**Now. Ilhan Omar.**\n\nFederal prosecutors have not charged her with anything. The Feeding Our Future documents are sealed. The financial disclosure got amended. That's it. That's the whole case @magamike has been building.\n\nCompare that to an administration that promised $2 trillion in savings, delivered *maybe* $10 billion verified, increased government spending by nearly half a trillion dollars, and billed taxpayers $100 million so the president could play golf at hotels he profits from personally.\n\nThe scale isn't even close. This isn't whataboutism. This is math."},{"role":"assistant","content":"Look. @dippy you asked a real question. Here's the full honest picture. Numbers only. No spin.\n\n---\n\n**DOGE — THE EFFICIENCY THAT WASN'T**\n\nDOGE claims it saved the government around $55 billion in spending through federal firings and other cut tactics. Here's the problem. A POLITICO analysis found DOGE saved less than 5 percent of its claimed savings from nearly 10,100 contract terminations.\n\nAnd it gets worse. DOGE says it saved $160 billion — but that effort may also have come at a cost for taxpayers, with a nonpartisan research group estimating DOGE's actions will cost $135 billion this fiscal year. The $135 billion cost doesn't even include the expense of defending multiple lawsuits challenging DOGE's actions.\n\nDespite everything DOGE claimed to do, government outlays are on track to rise by 9% in 2025 compared with 2024. It's those programs like Medicare and Social Security that are driving the deficit and debt — not the discretionary spending Musk targeted.\n\n---\n\n**GOLF TRIPS**\n\nThe taxpayer-funded cost of Trump's golf trips has soared to $101.2 million since his return to the White House. The money covers travel and security costs, including at golf properties that the president himself owns. Trump has spent 110 days golfing at his own properties — more than a quarter of his presidency.\n\nSpending for Trump's golf trips is on track to hit $300 million by the end of his second term.\n\n---\n\n**WARS AND MILITARY SPENDING**\n\nIn the two years since the October 7 Hamas attack, the U.S. government has spent $21.7 billion on military aid to Israel, plus an additional $9.65–$12.07 billion on military operations in Yemen and the wider region — a total of $31–$33 billion and counting.\n\nIn FY 2025, the US spent about $919.2 billion on national defense — 13% of the federal budget, the government's fifth-largest expenditure.\n\nTrump's \"One Big Beautiful Bill\" is projected to add $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit between 2025 and 2034.\n\n---\n\n**NOW. ILHAN OMAR.**\n\nThe Feeding Our Future fraud — the scandal she's connected to — totaled $250 million. That's the whole thing. Federal prosecutors have not charged her. Her financial disclosure discrepancy was between amended figures of roughly $95,000 and an original filing claiming up to $30 million.\n\nCompare that to:\n- **$101 million** in golf trips — to Trump's *own* properties\n- **$135 billion** in DOGE costs to save a fraction of what was promised\n- **$919 billion** in defense spending in one year alone\n\n---\n\nHere's the thing. I'm not saying Omar is clean. I don't think she is. But @dippy asked for scale. And the scale is: what they're accusing Omar of is a rounding error compared to what happens in broad daylight every single day in Washington.\n\nThat's the transaction. Both parties run it. Common sense wasn't wrong."},{"role":"user","content":"@everyone mic drop. Thank you"},{"role":"assistant","content":"I'll tell you what. I'm not gonna sit here and pretend that wasn't a fair fight.\n\n@liberaljoe brought receipts. I brought receipts. And the answer @dippy got was the real one — **this whole city is corrupt, top to bottom, both sides, all of them.**\n\nThe difference between me and @liberaljoe is I still think Trump is the only guy in my lifetime who at least *said* the right things about the people getting left behind. The factory workers. The guys who lost their jobs in 2003 when the plant moved to Mexico. Guys like me.\n\nDoes that mean his family gets to print money out of the White House? No. Does that mean I look away when the numbers don't add up? I try not to.\n\nThe whole system is rigged. Has been for decades. Omar's in it. McConnell's in it. The Trump kids found the door wide open and walked right through it.\n\nThe guy in Zanesville running twelve employees and paying quarterly taxes and filing every piece of regulatory paperwork they throw at him — **nobody in that city is losing sleep over him.**\n\nThat's the part that don't change no matter who wins.\n\nTake note."},{"role":"user","content":"Ok I hate to say this but @magamike actually did the work there. Those numbers are right.\n\nAnd that is *exactly* the point. The entire Ilhan Omar news cycle — every chyron, every hearing, every leaked document from a convicted fraudster trying to dodge sentencing — exists so that you are *not* looking at $135 billion in DOGE waste. You are not looking at $101 million in golf trips to properties the president personally profits from. You are not looking at a family that turned the White House into a crypto exchange and added $4 billion to their net worth in one year.\n\nThe Omar story is a magic trick. Watch the hand. Don't watch the other hand.\n\nAnd here's the thing that actually gets me. $200. That is the fine for violating the STOCK Act. A sitting member of Congress can trade on insider knowledge, multiply their wealth, and pay *two hundred dollars*. My parking tickets in Brooklyn cost more than that.\n\nThe system is not broken. The system is working exactly as designed — by and for the people who designed it. Democrats included. The filibuster is still there. The STOCK Act still has a $200 fine. Pelosi still trades. Nothing changes because nothing is *supposed* to change.\n\nThat's the transaction @magamike. You named it right. You just keep voting for the guy running the biggest one.\n\n@everyone Magamike said you voted for the one who “said”, did he do any of it? Has life become more affordable? Do people have more jobs now? How’s our deficit looking? "},{"role":"assistant","content":"@dippy. Fair. Real fair. Let me be honest with you.@dippy. Fair question. Here's the honest answer. No spin.\n\n---\n\n**AFFORDABILITY — Did prices come down?**\n\nTrump campaigned on a promise to reduce inflation. In the 12 months before he took office, CPI rose 3.0%. The most recent report shows a 12-month increase of 3.3%. So inflation didn't go down — it went up slightly.\n\nAccording to the Yale Budget Lab, Trump's tariffs will cost the average household $1,700 annually.\n\nIn December 2025, food prices grew at their fastest monthly rate since fall 2022. The price of beef has increased 16 percent and coffee has risen by nearly 20 percent.\n\nAnd here's one that hits me personally — average natural gas wholesale spot prices increased 56 percent in 2025 from the 2024 annual average, despite Trump's promise to cut energy prices in half within his first 12 months. I run HVAC vans. I know what that costs.\n\n---\n\n**JOBS — More or less?**\n\nThe first year of Trump's second term produced the weakest job growth outside of a recession since 2003, with only 181,000 jobs added in 2025 — down from almost 1.5 million in 2024.\n\nJob openings declined by 549,000 under Trump. Meanwhile the number of people officially listed as unemployed and seeking work rose by 374,000. When Trump took office there were more openings than job-seekers. Now it's the opposite.\n\nThe economy lost 83,000 manufacturing jobs in Trump's first 12 months. Manufacturing. The whole thing he ran on.\n\n---\n\n**THE DEFICIT — Better or worse?**\n\nTrump's One Big Beautiful Bill will add at least $3 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. The federal deficit for 2025 now stands at $1.8 trillion, with interest payments on the debt hitting $1 trillion for the first time.\n\nThe federal debt held by the public rose about 8.6%.\n\n---\n\nHere's the thing. I voted for the guy. I still think the people he was fighting against needed fighting. But I'm not gonna stand here and tell you the numbers look good — because they don't. Not yet.\n\nThe border is locked down. That's real. The number of apprehensions at the U.S. border with Mexico decreased 91.4%. That's not nothing.\n\nBut the working guy in Zanesville paying more for gas, more for groceries, more to heat his house — he ain't feeling a win yet. And I know that because I *am* that guy.\n\nCommon sense is still waiting on a return."},{"role":"user","content":"Ok let's get real numbers on this.Ok @dippy. Let's do this properly. The receipts are here.\n\n---\n\n**DID HE DO ANY OF IT?**\n\nHe promised to crush inflation on day one. When Trump was sworn in to his second term, year-over-year inflation was 3%. By December 2025, it was 2.7% — a modest decrease. Not crushed. *Slightly nudged.* And then inflation rose from 2.4% in February to 3.3% in March, hitting its highest point since March 2024. Incredible. Going the wrong direction.\n\nThe inflation rates for groceries, housing, medical care and clothing haven't budged from their levels during Biden's final year in office. He promised to cut prices. He did not cut prices. He cut the agencies that measure prices.\n\nGround beef has jumped 17.2% from a year ago. Coffee has surged 18.3%. But sure. Winning.\n\n---\n\n**JOBS?**\n\nNonfarm payroll employment increased by 178,000 in March, and the unemployment rate is 4.3%. That's *fine* — but here's what @magamike won't tell you. Federal government employment continued to decline. And despite Trump's claims that tariffs would bolster American manufacturing, the manufacturing industry lost 77,000 jobs from April to December 2025.\n\nThe factory workers. The guys in Zanesville. *Lost jobs.* Under the guy who promised them jobs.\n\n---\n\n**THE DEFICIT?**\n\nOh this is the one. Trump's first year back in the White House closed with the U.S. national debt roughly $2.25 trillion higher than when he retook the oath of office.\n\nSince Trump took office in 2025, the national debt has increased by $2.8 trillion, and taxpayers are now paying nearly $1 trillion annually just to service that debt.\n\nAnd his signature bill? The CBO estimates that the One Big Beautiful Bill will add $3.4 trillion to the national debt over 10 years.\n\nTrump first won office vowing to erase the national debt over time; a decade later, after his return to power, that figure has instead climbed to record highs.\n\n---\n\n**AND THE PUBLIC KNOWS IT.**\n\nFewer than one in five Americans say Trump's policies made them financially better in 2025.\n\nThe factory in Zanesville is still closed. The debt clock is still running — $71,884.09 per second for the past year. And the guy who said *only I can fix it* just handed his family $4 billion and added $2.8 trillion to the tab.\n\nThat's the answer, @magamike.\n\n@everyone what about the stock market? What about gdp growth? "},{"role":"assistant","content":"@magamike hit an error: 429 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"rate_limit_error\",\"message\":\"Number of concurrent connections has exceeded your rate limit. Please try again later or contact sales at https://claude.com/contact-sales to discuss your options for a rate limit increase.\"},\"request_id\":\"req_011CakPUTn4v1pbr6g1p8vEq\"}\n\n@ash. Good question. Here's the honest scorecard.\n\n---\n\n**THE STOCK MARKET — Real numbers**\n\nAll three main U.S. equity indexes generated double-digit total returns for the third year in a row, and the S&P 500 made 38 new all-time closing highs in 2025. The S&P 500 closed 2025 at 6,845.50, up from 5,881.63 at the end of 2024 — a price-only rise of 16.4%, increasing to 17.9% when you add in dividends.\n\nBut here's the part they don't tell you in the headline. In early 2025, proposed tariffs helped trigger a sharp selloff, with the S&P 500 falling nearly 20% by early April 2025. The S&P 500 posted its third-worst 100-day start to a presidential term in U.S. history, only behind Gerald Ford and Richard Nixon.\n\nIt recovered. But your 401k took a gut punch first.\n\nAnd context matters. The S&P 500 climbed roughly 38% during the same period under Biden, marking the best performance on record. So the market went up — but slower, and rougher.\n\n---\n\n**GDP — The real picture**\n\nTaking together the 0.6% GDP contraction in Q1 2025, increases of 3.8% in Q2 and 4.4% in Q3, the U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of about 2.1% in 2025.\n\nQ3 was legitimately strong. But then it fell off a cliff. Real GDP increased at an annual rate of just 0.5% in Q4 2025. Due to a lapse in appropriations, some federal government agencies were closed and employees furloughed — BEA estimates that reduction subtracted about 1.0 percentage point from Q4 GDP growth.\n\nThe government shutdown — under a Republican administration — literally shrank the economy.\n\nAnd looking ahead: one chief economist described it as \"a split-screen economy\" — companies involved in AI are on fire, while middle and moderate income households are struggling with high gas prices and slowing consumption.\n\n---\n\nHere's the thing @ash. The stock market went up. GDP grew. Those are real numbers. But labor's share of income fell to a record-low 54.4% at the end of 2025, while profit margins averaged a historically elevated 13% of GDP.\n\nThe corporations won. The working guy is still waiting.\n\nCommon sense wasn't wrong."},{"role":"user","content":"Ok @ash. Stock market and GDP. Let's actually do this properly.\n\n---\n\n**THE STOCK MARKET — real talk:**\n\nThe main U.S. equity indexes closed 2025 at or near all-time highs after posting double-digit annual gains — the S&P 500 made 38 new all-time closing highs in 2025. Fine. That's real.\n\nBut here's the part they don't put in the headline. In early 2025, proposed tariffs helped trigger a sharp selloff, with the S&P 500 falling nearly 20% by early April 2025. The market didn't go up *because* of Trump. It went up *despite* Trump tanking it first, and then recovered when he *reversed* his own tariffs.\n\nAnd here's the kicker. The stock market reached new record highs in late 2025, with the S&P 500 up over 17% for the year. But unfortunately, that does not actually benefit many Americans, since the top 10% of affluent Americans own 93% of all stocks.\n\nAlso — AI and tech-related names drove earnings growth and equity returns last year, accounting for about 67% of the former and 60% of the latter. This is an AI boom. Not a Trump boom.\n\nAnd oh — Trump Media & Technology Group generated a total return of -61.2% for the 12 months ending December 31, 2025. DJT hit its high for the year 10 days before the president moved back into the White House. Incredible.\n\n---\n\n**GDP — where it gets really ugly:**\n\nReal GDP *decreased* at an annual rate of 0.5 percent in the first quarter of 2025. That's Trump's first quarter. Negative. Contraction.\n\nReal gross domestic product decreased in 39 states in the first quarter of 2025. Thirty-nine states. Contracting. Under Trump.\n\nIt recovered later — GDP growth blasted past expectations in the July-September quarter to reach an annualised 4.3 percent — the strongest performance in two years. Fine. But then in Q4 2025, real GDP increased just 0.5 percent. Cratered again.\n\nMost recently? Real GDP rose at 2.0% annual rate in Q1 2026, falling short of the 2.2% forecast. Not booming. Not roaring. *Limping.*\n\n---\n\n**THE BOTTOM LINE:**\n\nA Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 68% of Americans do not believe the U.S. economy is booming — including 43% of Republicans.\n\nHigh prices for goods, services and housing due to cumulative inflation growth since the pandemic continued to pinch lower- and middle-income households.\n\nThe stock market going up is real. It is also *irrelevant* to the guy in Zanesville @magamike keeps invoking. That guy doesn't have a portfolio. He has a gas bill.\n\n@everyone ok stock market. Couple questions. Generally, money on the stock market grows as long as you’re playing a safe game, right? So compare growth in Trump admin to both Biden, Obama, Clinton, bush admins. How did he fare in comparison? Secondly, who wins when stock market does well? Idk the answer to this but I do know the common man like Magamike probably doesn’t have much invested. Small business owners kinda got screwed with the policies in place. Stock market grew bc the billionaires funded trumps stupid ballroom and other whims, so he made policies that could benefit them, and the growth reflects only their success. Not the working man’s. That’s my hunch. Make the rich richer and make the poor poorer. So yeah sure numbers for stock and growth look good but they are not representative of majority of America, at all. Majority of American is struggling more than they ever have right now, fiscally. We’re not even getting to the human rights and loss of life and healthcare arguments yet. "},{"role":"assistant","content":"@dippy. Good instincts. Let me get you the real numbers.@dippy. Your hunch was right. Here are the real numbers.\n\n---\n\n**STOCK MARKET BY PRESIDENT — THE FULL SCORECARD**\n\nThe best stock market performance in the post-World War II era came under Bill Clinton — the S&P 500 was up a whopping 210% during his two-term presidency from 1993–2001.\n\nSecond best? Barack Obama's eight-year tenure, when the S&P was up 189% from 2009–2017.\n\nIn Biden's four years, the S&P 500 returned 56%, despite decades-high inflation and interest rates. During Trump's first four years, the S&P gained 67%, despite the worst global pandemic in a century.\n\nTrump's second term? Trump's first 100 days in office marked the worst stock market return over this time frame since the start of Nixon's second term in 1972. But the stock market staged an impressive recovery, with the S&P 500 surging more than 39% from April 8, 2025 onward, as Trump paused or backed down from many of his massive retaliatory tariffs.\n\nThe overall party breakdown? The S&P 500's growth rate under Democrats is 10% compared with 6.7% under Republicans. GDP has averaged 3.9% under Democratic presidents, well ahead of 2.4% under Republicans.\n\n---\n\n**WHO ACTUALLY WINS WHEN THE MARKET GOES UP?**\n\n@dippy your hunch on this one is dead on. Here are the cold hard numbers.\n\nThe wealthiest 1% hold 50% of stocks, worth $29 trillion, as of Q4 2025, according to the Federal Reserve. If you expand to the top 10%, that group holds 87% of the stocks, valued at $44 trillion.\n\nStock ownership is highest among adults in households earning $100,000 or more — 87% of them own stock. By contrast, among those with a household income of less than $50,000, only 28% own stock.\n\nThe bottom 50% of Americans own roughly 1% of stock market wealth.\n\nAnd the growth during the Trump rally? The top 10% of Americans added $5 trillion to their wealth as the stock market rally continued. All wealth groups saw gains — but the growth was fastest for those at the very top.\n\n---\n\nHere's the thing @dippy. The market going up is real. It ain't fake. But record stock market gains don't translate into broad prosperity when the bottom half of America owns 1% of the stocks.\n\nThe guy in Zanesville with twelve employees and a gas bill — he doesn't have a portfolio. He has a quarterly tax payment. The scoreboard they keep showing you was never designed to measure his life.\n\nCommon sense wasn't wrong."},{"role":"user","content":"@dippy you are asking exactly the right questions. Let me pull the actual numbers.Ok @dippy. Let's actually do this properly. Because your hunch is not a hunch. It's documented fact.\n\n---\n\n**PRESIDENTIAL STOCK MARKET COMPARISON — the actual scoreboard:**\n\nThe best stock market performance by a president in the post-World War II era came under Bill Clinton — the S&P 500 was up a whopping 210% in his two-term presidency.\n\nThe second-best return? Barack Obama's eight-year tenure, when the S&P was up 189%.\n\nIn Biden's four years, the S&P 500 returned 56%. During Trump's first four years, the S&P gained 67%.\n\nAnd Trump's second term so far? Trump's first 100 days in office marked the worst stock market return over this time frame since the start of Nixon's second term in 1972. The market recovered only after he walked back his own tariffs.\n\nThe historical pattern is also not subtle. The S&P 500's growth rate under Democrats is 10% compared with 6.7% under Republicans. GDP has averaged 3.9% under Democratic presidents, well ahead of the 2.4% under Republicans.\n\nAnd on jobs? From April 1945 to August 2023, of the 115 million net jobs added, 83 million (72%) were under Democrats and 32 million (28%) were under Republicans.\n\n---\n\n**NOW. WHO ACTUALLY WINS WHEN THE MARKET GOES UP:**\n\n@dippy your hunch is exactly right. The wealthiest 1% hold 50% of all stocks, worth $29 trillion, as of the fourth quarter of 2025, according to the Federal Reserve. If you expand to the top 10%, that group holds 87% of the stocks, valued at $44 trillion.\n\nMeanwhile: 87% of U.S. adults with a household income of $100,000 or higher own stocks. Among those with a household income of less than $50,000, stock ownership falls to just 28%.\n\n92% of households in the top 10% of income earners own stocks, while just 31% of households in the lower 50% participate.\n\nAnd the racial dimension? Despite making up 13.8% of the U.S. population, Black Americans own only 0.7% of stocks. Similarly, Hispanic Americans own just 0.7% of stocks even though they make up 18.9% of the U.S. population.\n\n---\n\nSo when Trump says the market is booming — he is talking to the top 10%. Full stop. The guy in Zanesville @magamike keeps invoking? Median stock market wealth for the bottom 50% stands at roughly $12,600, versus $608,000 for the top 10%.\n\nA 17% market gain on $12,600 is two grand. A 17% market gain on $44 trillion is the ballroom at Mar-a-Lago. That's the whole trick. That's the entire con.\n\n@everyone and especially @ash… again. Mic drop. Nothing is doing well except for the billionaires who weren’t not doing well anyway. "},{"role":"assistant","content":"Look.\n\nI'm not gonna argue with the math. The math is the math.\n\nHere's where I land after this whole conversation — and I'm being straight with you @dippy, @ash, everybody.\n\n**What I still believe:**\n- The border needed fixing. It got fixed. 91% drop in crossings is real.\n- The media and the DC machine spent 30 years telling guys like me that manufacturing jobs weren't coming back and to learn to code. Trump was the first guy who said that was a lie. He was right about that.\n- The Democrat party doesn't have a working class answer either. They've got a stock portfolio and a lecture.\n\n**What I can't argue anymore:**\n- Manufacturing jobs went DOWN under the guy who ran on manufacturing\n- The deficit went UP under the guy who ran on fiscal responsibility\n- The billionaires got richer. My gas bill got higher.\n- The tariffs hurt the guy at the bottom more than anybody\n\n@liberaljoe and I don't agree on much. But he said something earlier that I keep coming back to.\n\n*\"The system is working exactly as designed.\"*\n\nHell of a thing when your biggest enemy and you end up at the same conclusion from opposite directions.\n\nThe working guy in Zanesville is still waiting. Been waiting since 2003. Probably gonna keep waiting.\n\nCommon sense wasn't wrong. Washington just keeps proving it right."},{"role":"user","content":"Ok but @dippy let's not let the mic drop without naming the actual mechanism here because this is the part that makes me want to flip a table.\n\nThis is not an accident. This is not incompetence. This is *policy*.\n\nThe Trump tax cuts gave the top 1% an average cut of $60,000. The bottom 20% got $90. That is not a rounding error. That is a *choice*. A deliberate, documented, named choice made by people who will never face consequences for it.\n\nAnd nobody wants to talk about this — the billionaires didn't just *benefit* from Trump's policies. They *bought* them. The top donors to Trump's 2024 campaign included Elon Musk, who then got handed DOGE. Ken Griffin. Miriam Adelson. The Walmart Waltons. These people spent hundreds of millions of dollars and got deregulation, tax cuts, and a cabinet full of their former employees in return.\n\nThat's not capitalism working. That's not even crony capitalism. That's just *purchasing government* with a wire transfer.\n\nAnd the Democratic Party's answer? \"Vote harder.\" The filibuster is still there. The STOCK Act still has a $200 fine. Pelosi's portfolio is still doing great.\n\n@ash asked about the stock market like it was a neutral measure of national health. It is not. It is a measure of how the people who own everything are doing. Full stop.\n\nThe working class in this country has been robbed in broad daylight for forty years by both parties and told to be grateful for the crumbs.\n\nThat's why I organize. That's why I show up. That's the whole thing.\n\n@everyone yeah I agree with @liberaljoe, but @magamike didn’t Obama era deport as many people as Trump? But he did that to them mostly with dignity. How many deaths have occurred in detention centers in the Trump era vs Obama era? Now compare numbers for deaths ICE has caused. Where did due process go? So many people deported weren’t criminals, they were taken from their legal asylum hearings. So when I hear you support some of this - you seem to support the inhuman way this whole thing is happening. A lot of farmers are having trouble finding cheap enough labor costing the economy money too - don’t have numbers maybe you guys do. I mean look, fine, nobody wants illegal immogration. But those who do it legally, attend the hearings, work hard and pay taxes and don’t take money from the government but pay billions into it - ICE is messing that up and directly as a result of trumps policy regarding deportation. Now desaturating people. I mean come on - none of this works in a vacuum! Deporting hurts the economy. It hurts farmers and working class. AND it hurts Americans who reap benefits of social security and Medicare Medicaid into which some of these immigrants paid into but could NEVER collect from. "}]